Report: Soil Carbon Credits Need More Consistency to Reduce Emissions
Carbon credits seem like a great idea. But there’s an awful lot we don’t know.
Carbon markets for agriculture are a capitalism-friendly method to, theoretically, reduce carbon dioxide emissions.
At its core, the idea is simple: Soil can store carbon. Therefore, those with lots of land—farmers, often—can implement extra-storage practices to create “credits,” which polluting companies can purchase from them to offset their own less-good practices. In reality, many scientists and environmentalists believe there are massive problems with the entire concept. A new report from the Environmental Defense Fund and the Woodwell Climate Research Center finds that, well, yeah, there are problems.
This new report looks at 12 different systems for measuring carbon levels in soil, the fundamental way that these markets figure out what kinds of actions create what kinds of credits. And it found, just like many scientists have warned for years, that there’s very little consistency among them. Some of these systems measure soil directly. Some use modeling systems, which estimate effects based on other data. Some combine them.
The report says this is a huge problem. “This variation makes it difficult to ensure net climate benefits have been achieved,” the report says. “A lack of comparability and standardization will be especially problematic if the U.S. government decides to use SOC credits to meet nationally determined contributions or if sectors required to reduce emissions purchase SOC credits to compensate for emissions elsewhere.”
Carbon credit markets have achieved approval from both sides of the political aisle, and President Joe Biden has supported the Growing Climate Solutions Act, a piece of legislation that lays the groundwork for a large carbon market. On the private side, a whole host of startups have created their own carbon markets, trying to get in on the action. The American Farm Bureau, a Republican-leaning organization, supports it, too. Republican versus Democrat isn’t really the battle here; it’s more big business versus a variety of different oppositional forces, including groups such as the Center for Food Safety, Food & Water Watch and a whole bunch of scientists.
It is generally understood that soil can store a great deal of carbon and that many modern agricultural practices disturb the soil and release said carbon. It’s further generally understood that some practices, such as no-till and cover cropping, can keep more of that carbon in the soil. But this report, like others before it, found that there is a massive amount of variability in the key measurement of “how much carbon is stored when some practices are done.” Even within a single acre of land, differences in soil composition, moisture and elevation can dramatically change how much carbon can be stored with techniques such as cover cropping.
Then there are the added complications: what kinds of cover crops? How do those specific crops work with this specific soil? How long does it have to be done to see results, and what are those results? How do all the other things that happen on farms—fertilizing, pesticide use, compost—affect the bottom line? “The process of sampling and analyzing soils for SOC is time intensive, expensive and requires a high degree of analytical accuracy to limit analytical variance,” reads the report.
The report does offer some recommendations, most importantly figuring out a way to actually accurately measure soil carbon and how different actions affect it. Interestingly, the groups behind the report do recommend passing the Growing Climate Solutions Act, which is not something everyone agrees on. Their reasoning seems to be that having a centralized carbon market and monitoring agency would at least enable some consistency and provide resources to begin to work on this measuring stuff, as opposed to a cobbled-together hodgepodge of public and private carbon market startups.
Follow us
Republish!
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
-
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
-
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
-
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
-
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
-
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
-
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
-
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
-
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].Report: Soil Carbon Credits Need More Consistency to Reduce Emissions
by Dan Nosowitz, Modern Farmer
July 27, 2021
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreShare With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
Submit
Another Big Government intervention. Who will implement and administer this huge transfer of money from one industry to another? Who will determine what soil holds what amount of carbon?
Perhaps we should ask China and India to cut back on their carbon emissions. The USA is ahead of our commitment to curb our carbon emissions. This is just another transfer of wealth from the US to the rest of the world.